Automated Collection
Description
Adversaries may use automated techniques to collect data from AI systems and supporting enterprise environments. Automation may use scripts, command interpreters, command-line tools, or AI agent tools to identify, retrieve, copy, or aggregate data without a human selecting each individual item.
Collection criteria may be fixed, such as file name, type, location, owner, date. Automation may also collect repeatedly, monitor for new material, traverse related resources, or combine data from local systems, cloud services, repositories, databases, object stores, and application APIs.
In AI environments, targeted material may include models, datasets, configurations, conversation histories, retrieval databases, deployment information, logs, and other operational data.
- ATLAS ID
- AML.T0126
- Maturity
- RealizedUsed by real adversaries against AI systems in the wild.
- Platforms
- Enterprise
Mitigations
ATLAS 2026.09 lists no mitigation for this technique.
Case studies that use it
Related ATT&CK technique
ATLAS adapts this technique from MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise.
Across MITRE's defensive frameworks
Linked through the 1 ATT&CK technique above.
Counter with D3FEND
Defensive techniques MITRE D3FEND maps to the same ATT&CK techniques.
- D3-CFContent Filtering1 shared
- D3-CMContent Modification1 shared
- D3-DFDecoy File1 shared
- D3-FAFile Analysis1 shared
- D3-FEFile Encryption1 shared
- D3-FEVFile Eviction1 shared
- D3-FIMFile Integrity Monitoring1 shared
- D3-LFPLocal File Permissions1 shared
- D3-RFAMRemote File Access Mediation1 shared
- D3-RFRestore File1 shared
- D3-CQContent Quarantine1 shared