CAPEC-516: Hardware Component Substitution During Baselining
Description
An adversary with access to system components during allocated baseline development can substitute a maliciously altered hardware component for a baseline component during the product development and research phases. This can lead to adjustments and calibrations being made in the product so that when the final product, now containing the modified component, is deployed it will not perform as designed and be advantageous to the adversary.
- Likelihood of attack
- Low
- Typical severity
- High
- Abstraction
- DetailedA low-level, detailed pattern, often for a particular technology.
Mechanism of attack: Manipulate System Resources
Prerequisites
- The adversary will need either physical access or be able to supply malicious hardware components to the product development facility.
Skills required
- MediumIntelligence data on victim's purchasing habits.
- HighResources to maliciously construct/alter hardware components used for testing by the supplier.
- HighResources to physically infiltrate supplier.
Mitigations
- Hardware attacks are often difficult to detect, as inserted components can be difficult to identify or remain dormant for an extended period of time.
- Acquire hardware and hardware components from trusted vendors. Additionally, determine where vendors purchase components or if any components are created/acquired via subcontractors to determine where supply chain risks may exist.
Related weaknesses (CWE)
CAPEC 3.9 links no CWE weakness to this pattern.
ATT&CK techniques (CAPEC taxonomy mapping)
Across MITRE's defensive frameworks
Linked through the 1 ATT&CK technique above.
Counter with D3FEND
Defensive techniques MITRE D3FEND maps to the same ATT&CK techniques.